We’re going to go deep behind Executive Lines this week so
don’t get left behind. There is quite a
bit of regulation out there telling companies how to act, walk, talk, eat, etc,
etc, and if you want to raise some capital by selling shares of you company on
the market you will have much more to deal with. I will not be providing any opinions on the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, but over the last 30 years Corporate Governance has
received plenty of attention especially after Enron, Worldcom, and other situations.
What is corporate governance?
Let’s start with a definition on Corporate
Governance. Simply, it is the system by which
companies are directed and controlled, (Wikipedia, SEP 2012).
It attempts to define the interactions between Board of Director members,
management, and shareholders. You could
add stakeholders to this list also based on the amount of airplay companies
receive. But let’s focus on the basic
definition words “system”, and “directed and controlled”.
Much of this addresses the communication path through
management, the board, and shareholders.
We can see this in the shareholder reports, and on financial websites
with the company’s balance sheet, income statement, and statement of cash
flow. Inside the company the
communication the board and management uses should be a little more action oriented. When I say communication, I mean the metrics.
How good is the company’s delivery?
Oh, it’s good.
How good?
Real good.
Oh, it’s good.
How good?
Real good.
Sound familiar in the office area? Does anyone really know? When the strategic plan is built, there
should be some recognition of measurable performance goals. If you don’t know, go ask your customer what
is important about the delivery of your product. Oh, it needs to be good. How good?
Real good.
What is a Lean System?
Let’s go back to this system. When we talk about a Lean System, we are
talking about making our office products at the rate or pull of customer
demand. Do we have this thinking in our
systems? Yes, that does mean to put
Just-In-Time methods in our order systems.
Remember, JIT is not just about reducing inventory costs, it puts a
glaring spotlight on the problem areas.
The same areas where we improve the flow of our information products.
Align the Lean System with the Strategic plan and we begin
to provide actionable metrics going to the board and management, and in the
right hands of a visionary Leader this can produce transformation that
strengthens the company and produces happy customer. How happy?
Real happy!
The measures going to management should show how we are
affecting the results. These could show
that performance is better, worse, or remained the same. If the results have not changed, then the team
has not found the root causes, or the improvements are not working and we will
hold off the pizza party until we have sustained positive results.
Can we institutionalize continuous improvement?
Improvement can be
institutionalized by creating the expectation, and required metrics to review, and growing the people who show aptitude for Leadership out of
the ranks of Green Belts and Black belts.
I did not say that all Leaders should be belts, but there is a good place
to look. Leaders should have their performance
measured and Executives do not have a “come-apart” the first time a chart is Red or
Yellow. These are indicators of process
performance issues that need to be addressed.
ISO and CMMI provide frameworks of systems, but these are
dependent on people working within the boundaries and keeping the documentation
current. Companies and teams still
develop their own methods and processes and these should be measured and reported
upon. If you are not going to manage the
process, then don’t measure it. And don’t
be surprised if you do not receive the performance you think that you are
entitled to receive.
As we go through this journey, we should be using road signs
and maps to help us see where we are.
Working with Leadership and our employees will strengthen the
relationships and improve morale. Doing
the right things at the right time should result in satisfied customers.
Have you seen a successful transition of practices when Leadership has changed hands?
Isn't this just TQM repackaged?
ReplyDeleteI am not a TQM victim from the old days, but I have met several. I think the soft skills of TQM have been folded into the Lean and Six Sigma methods and that is what we see today with facilitators who are improving flow (the middle step in the triangle). There are pockets of excellence where they were smart enough to make the transition, but I have also seen plenty of places that could not, or would not, make it work.
DeleteI have seen JIT half-way implemented where purchasing stopped ordering parts but the organization did not improve the flow and install the signals. This resulted in not happy employees on the floor and in direct support positions, and not happy customers. Sad times for them too, they had a great product.
Bad processes will eventually overcome great people. Thanks!
The need for an overall corporate governance analytically framework that can be applied to different countries to help analyze their current situations, identify potential areas for improvement, and assess their relative feasibility and the steps needed to promote them. A country-specific analysis needs to be comprehensive, in the sense that it includes the four concepts of transparency, accountability, governance, and anti corruption throughout the calculus. Without such an analytic framework, any reform attempt is likely to flounder for lack of a shared understanding of the underlying problems and of the feasible reforms.
ReplyDeletehttp://vmo.com.au/index.php/Corporate-Governance/
Thanks for comments!
DeleteThe need for a framework certainly exists as there will be continued investments made in developing economies. Defining the four concepts with the different countries laws and cultural practices is the challenge. Further is using those concepts to transform our practices from Batch & Queue methods to One Piece Flow in our office products while remaining transparent and using governance methods with Standard Work, accountable and avoiding corruption with Metrics. Whether these practices are used in the U.S. or anywhere else, we are attempting to reduce investment risk and increase stakeholder satisfaction.
It is really a good experience to read this sort of beautiful article john , well there are a lot of companies and organizations has been established in order to make their client's business toward the continuous improvement, before of today's era this field wasn't so expand but now Kaizen Training is included in the major part in life as well as business any how it's good to read this article keep sharing dear!
ReplyDelete